<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The DIY Indie Band Biz Model…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/</link>
	<description>We like live music.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>Just noticed that my home page needed correcting. Cheers, Dan.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that my home page needed correcting. Cheers, Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-26429</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-26429</guid>
		<description>Just noticed that my home page needed correcting. Cheers, Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that my home page needed correcting. Cheers, Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eat_the_stems</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>eat_the_stems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>This was an inspired post.

I think it&#039;s only a stigma that keeps all the bands you mentioned from being popular in the conventional sense. UM, tDB, STS9 et al. play longwinded music sometimes, and the people who publish mainstream periodicals these days are inclined to hate that. Thus, we&#039;ll never see Barber rocking the shades on the cover of the Rolling Stone.

But that&#039;s not a bad thing. It just reflects how out-of-touch the mainstream press is. But Umphrey&#039;s McGee is still selling plenty of tickets because music listeners are more inclined to believe their friends than some anonymous posturing writer. Since these bands are making dough and selling out shows, I don&#039;t see any reason for them to change their business model. It&#039;s the Rolling Stones and New York Timeses of the world that are proving to be obsolete. And that&#039;s why I read your blog more than those rags.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an inspired post.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s only a stigma that keeps all the bands you mentioned from being popular in the conventional sense. UM, tDB, STS9 et al. play longwinded music sometimes, and the people who publish mainstream periodicals these days are inclined to hate that. Thus, we&#8217;ll never see Barber rocking the shades on the cover of the Rolling Stone.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not a bad thing. It just reflects how out-of-touch the mainstream press is. But Umphrey&#8217;s McGee is still selling plenty of tickets because music listeners are more inclined to believe their friends than some anonymous posturing writer. Since these bands are making dough and selling out shows, I don&#8217;t see any reason for them to change their business model. It&#8217;s the Rolling Stones and New York Timeses of the world that are proving to be obsolete. And that&#8217;s why I read your blog more than those rags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eat_the_stems</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-26428</link>
		<dc:creator>eat_the_stems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-26428</guid>
		<description>This was an inspired post.

I think it&#039;s only a stigma that keeps all the bands you mentioned from being popular in the conventional sense. UM, tDB, STS9 et al. play longwinded music sometimes, and the people who publish mainstream periodicals these days are inclined to hate that. Thus, we&#039;ll never see Barber rocking the shades on the cover of the Rolling Stone.

But that&#039;s not a bad thing. It just reflects how out-of-touch the mainstream press is. But Umphrey&#039;s McGee is still selling plenty of tickets because music listeners are more inclined to believe their friends than some anonymous posturing writer. Since these bands are making dough and selling out shows, I don&#039;t see any reason for them to change their business model. It&#039;s the Rolling Stones and New York Timeses of the world that are proving to be obsolete. And that&#039;s why I read your blog more than those rags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an inspired post.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s only a stigma that keeps all the bands you mentioned from being popular in the conventional sense. UM, tDB, STS9 et al. play longwinded music sometimes, and the people who publish mainstream periodicals these days are inclined to hate that. Thus, we&#8217;ll never see Barber rocking the shades on the cover of the Rolling Stone.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not a bad thing. It just reflects how out-of-touch the mainstream press is. But Umphrey&#8217;s McGee is still selling plenty of tickets because music listeners are more inclined to believe their friends than some anonymous posturing writer. Since these bands are making dough and selling out shows, I don&#8217;t see any reason for them to change their business model. It&#8217;s the Rolling Stones and New York Timeses of the world that are proving to be obsolete. And that&#8217;s why I read your blog more than those rags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHITperson</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>WHITperson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>Right on Bruce ! All good points.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily a bad thing when the WSJ or Billboard writes an article like this. It allows them to make larger points about the music industry while pointing to a hip, indie band that bloggers have been discussing (for years now). And I agree on the CD thing...what&#039;s funny is that, at least in my opinion, CYHSY&#039;s music is probably less accessible to your typical WSJ reader than say, a moe. concert, but maybe moe.&#039;s just too far off their radar (which is one of my points).

I think we&#039;ll continue to see versions of this article every 4-6 months for the next couple years, each with a different spin. I won&#039;t hold my breath for a feature on any of the bands I mentioned above...that might take another &quot;Big Cypress&quot; moment.

By the way, thanks for reading/commenting!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Bruce ! All good points.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily a bad thing when the WSJ or Billboard writes an article like this. It allows them to make larger points about the music industry while pointing to a hip, indie band that bloggers have been discussing (for years now). And I agree on the CD thing&#8230;what&#8217;s funny is that, at least in my opinion, CYHSY&#8217;s music is probably less accessible to your typical WSJ reader than say, a moe. concert, but maybe moe.&#8217;s just too far off their radar (which is one of my points).</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll continue to see versions of this article every 4-6 months for the next couple years, each with a different spin. I won&#8217;t hold my breath for a feature on any of the bands I mentioned above&#8230;that might take another &#8220;Big Cypress&#8221; moment.</p>
<p>By the way, thanks for reading/commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHITperson</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-26427</link>
		<dc:creator>WHITperson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-26427</guid>
		<description>Right on Bruce ! All good points.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily a bad thing when the WSJ or Billboard writes an article like this. It allows them to make larger points about the music industry while pointing to a hip, indie band that bloggers have been discussing (for years now). And I agree on the CD thing...what&#039;s funny is that, at least in my opinion, CYHSY&#039;s music is probably less accessible to your typical WSJ reader than say, a moe. concert, but maybe moe.&#039;s just too far off their radar (which is one of my points).

I think we&#039;ll continue to see versions of this article every 4-6 months for the next couple years, each with a different spin. I won&#039;t hold my breath for a feature on any of the bands I mentioned above...that might take another &quot;Big Cypress&quot; moment.

By the way, thanks for reading/commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Bruce ! All good points.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily a bad thing when the WSJ or Billboard writes an article like this. It allows them to make larger points about the music industry while pointing to a hip, indie band that bloggers have been discussing (for years now). And I agree on the CD thing&#8230;what&#8217;s funny is that, at least in my opinion, CYHSY&#8217;s music is probably less accessible to your typical WSJ reader than say, a moe. concert, but maybe moe.&#8217;s just too far off their radar (which is one of my points).</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll continue to see versions of this article every 4-6 months for the next couple years, each with a different spin. I won&#8217;t hold my breath for a feature on any of the bands I mentioned above&#8230;that might take another &#8220;Big Cypress&#8221; moment.</p>
<p>By the way, thanks for reading/commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Houghton</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re 100% right on.  Sometimes I think that articles like the one in the Wall Street Journal on CYHSY are an excuse for some guy in a suit to write about the same stuff that the cool music journalists and bloggers do.

Jam and other bands from String Cheese, Phish, Moe on down to newbies like Hot Buttered Rum have been following the Grateful Dead model re-worked for the digital ads model for years now and only Phish and maybe the String Cheese/Madison House got any mainstream ink. Perhaps its because CYHSY are actually a band that the industry imagines could be on a major label?

Either way l&#039;il ol bloggers like you and me (at Hypebot &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyepbot.com)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hyepbot.com)&lt;/a&gt; will carry the spread the word. It ain&#039;t much but maybe it reaches the folks that matter.  How many WSJ readers went out and bought a Clap CD?





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re 100% right on.  Sometimes I think that articles like the one in the Wall Street Journal on CYHSY are an excuse for some guy in a suit to write about the same stuff that the cool music journalists and bloggers do.</p>
<p>Jam and other bands from String Cheese, Phish, Moe on down to newbies like Hot Buttered Rum have been following the Grateful Dead model re-worked for the digital ads model for years now and only Phish and maybe the String Cheese/Madison House got any mainstream ink. Perhaps its because CYHSY are actually a band that the industry imagines could be on a major label?</p>
<p>Either way l&#8217;il ol bloggers like you and me (at Hypebot <a href="http://www.hyepbot.com)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.hyepbot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hyepbot.com</a>) will carry the spread the word. It ain&#8217;t much but maybe it reaches the folks that matter.  How many WSJ readers went out and bought a Clap CD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Houghton</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model/comment-page-1/#comment-26426</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2007/01/19/the-diy-indie-band-biz-model%e2%80%a6/#comment-26426</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re 100% right on.  Sometimes I think that articles like the one in the Wall Street Journal on CYHSY are an excuse for some guy in a suit to write about the same stuff that the cool music journalists and bloggers do.

Jam and other bands from String Cheese, Phish, Moe on down to newbies like Hot Buttered Rum have been following the Grateful Dead model re-worked for the digital ads model for years now and only Phish and maybe the String Cheese/Madison House got any mainstream ink. Perhaps its because CYHSY are actually a band that the industry imagines could be on a major label?

Either way l&#039;il ol bloggers like you and me (at Hypebot &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyepbot.com)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hyepbot.com)&lt;/a&gt; will carry the spread the word. It ain&#039;t much but maybe it reaches the folks that matter.  How many WSJ readers went out and bought a Clap CD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re 100% right on.  Sometimes I think that articles like the one in the Wall Street Journal on CYHSY are an excuse for some guy in a suit to write about the same stuff that the cool music journalists and bloggers do.</p>
<p>Jam and other bands from String Cheese, Phish, Moe on down to newbies like Hot Buttered Rum have been following the Grateful Dead model re-worked for the digital ads model for years now and only Phish and maybe the String Cheese/Madison House got any mainstream ink. Perhaps its because CYHSY are actually a band that the industry imagines could be on a major label?</p>
<p>Either way l&#8217;il ol bloggers like you and me (at Hypebot <a href="http://www.hyepbot.com)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.hyepbot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hyepbot.com</a>) will carry the spread the word. It ain&#8217;t much but maybe it reaches the folks that matter.  How many WSJ readers went out and bought a Clap CD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

