<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Grateful Dead Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/</link>
	<description>We like live music.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>I hear you, Justin, and it can be counter productive, as all these tributes seem to melt into one and you can&#039;t tell one from the other. I&#039;m with you on that.

But also, I think alot depends on who it is that&#039;s honoring the band, like the B52&#039;s (just an example) opposed to Keller/Mosely/Austin.  Those 3 guys love the Dead and play their music constantly on tour, so a tribute, I think, is appropriate, irregardless of how many there have been or will be.  I think it&#039;s also cool hearing other artists&#039; take on Dead tunes.

Would be better not to have so many come at once, for sure



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you, Justin, and it can be counter productive, as all these tributes seem to melt into one and you can&#8217;t tell one from the other. I&#8217;m with you on that.</p>
<p>But also, I think alot depends on who it is that&#8217;s honoring the band, like the B52&#8242;s (just an example) opposed to Keller/Mosely/Austin.  Those 3 guys love the Dead and play their music constantly on tour, so a tribute, I think, is appropriate, irregardless of how many there have been or will be.  I think it&#8217;s also cool hearing other artists&#8217; take on Dead tunes.</p>
<p>Would be better not to have so many come at once, for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-23879</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-23879</guid>
		<description>I hear you, Justin, and it can be counter productive, as all these tributes seem to melt into one and you can&#039;t tell one from the other. I&#039;m with you on that.

But also, I think alot depends on who it is that&#039;s honoring the band, like the B52&#039;s (just an example) opposed to Keller/Mosely/Austin.  Those 3 guys love the Dead and play their music constantly on tour, so a tribute, I think, is appropriate, irregardless of how many there have been or will be.  I think it&#039;s also cool hearing other artists&#039; take on Dead tunes.

Would be better not to have so many come at once, for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you, Justin, and it can be counter productive, as all these tributes seem to melt into one and you can&#8217;t tell one from the other. I&#8217;m with you on that.</p>
<p>But also, I think alot depends on who it is that&#8217;s honoring the band, like the B52&#8242;s (just an example) opposed to Keller/Mosely/Austin.  Those 3 guys love the Dead and play their music constantly on tour, so a tribute, I think, is appropriate, irregardless of how many there have been or will be.  I think it&#8217;s also cool hearing other artists&#8217; take on Dead tunes.</p>
<p>Would be better not to have so many come at once, for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I think it&#039;s a bigger problem in the jamband scene that the Dead are still the &quot;reigning&quot; kings of the scene, though Phish held the crown for a long time during their run.

I&#039;m curious if this is because the Dead (as well as Phish) created/developed a unique backstory and history, whereas other bands fail to do this and are relegated to being derivative?&lt;/i&gt;

I think you hit the nail on the head with that bit. I LOVE the dead.  Heck, I&#039;m reviewing the entire Dick&#039;s Picks series on my blog, but the problem with the scene is that so much of it is derivative garbage.

Sometimes I&#039;ll hear people go on and on about something and am amazed at how bland it is and how much it pales to the Grateful Dead, Phish, Widespread Panic or whoever some of the giants of the scene are.

Thankfully, there are other extremely talented acts out there doing their own thing: Benevento-Russo Duo, Galactic, Particle, Robert Randolph, etc.

I have to say though, I saw the Grateful Dead a handful of times, I saw Phish 25+ times and I&#039;d rather listen to the real deal that a bunch of phony imitators any day of the week.

That being said, I&#039;m always out seeing new bands play and looking for the next big thing.  There&#039;s plenty of great stuff out there, but there&#039;s also a trainload of pretenders and wannabes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I think it&#8217;s a bigger problem in the jamband scene that the Dead are still the &#8220;reigning&#8221; kings of the scene, though Phish held the crown for a long time during their run.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious if this is because the Dead (as well as Phish) created/developed a unique backstory and history, whereas other bands fail to do this and are relegated to being derivative?</i></p>
<p>I think you hit the nail on the head with that bit. I LOVE the dead.  Heck, I&#8217;m reviewing the entire Dick&#8217;s Picks series on my blog, but the problem with the scene is that so much of it is derivative garbage.</p>
<p>Sometimes I&#8217;ll hear people go on and on about something and am amazed at how bland it is and how much it pales to the Grateful Dead, Phish, Widespread Panic or whoever some of the giants of the scene are.</p>
<p>Thankfully, there are other extremely talented acts out there doing their own thing: Benevento-Russo Duo, Galactic, Particle, Robert Randolph, etc.</p>
<p>I have to say though, I saw the Grateful Dead a handful of times, I saw Phish 25+ times and I&#8217;d rather listen to the real deal that a bunch of phony imitators any day of the week.</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m always out seeing new bands play and looking for the next big thing.  There&#8217;s plenty of great stuff out there, but there&#8217;s also a trainload of pretenders and wannabes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-23878</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-23878</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I think it&#039;s a bigger problem in the jamband scene that the Dead are still the &quot;reigning&quot; kings of the scene, though Phish held the crown for a long time during their run.

I&#039;m curious if this is because the Dead (as well as Phish) created/developed a unique backstory and history, whereas other bands fail to do this and are relegated to being derivative?&lt;/i&gt;

I think you hit the nail on the head with that bit. I LOVE the dead.  Heck, I&#039;m reviewing the entire Dick&#039;s Picks series on my blog, but the problem with the scene is that so much of it is derivative garbage.

Sometimes I&#039;ll hear people go on and on about something and am amazed at how bland it is and how much it pales to the Grateful Dead, Phish, Widespread Panic or whoever some of the giants of the scene are.

Thankfully, there are other extremely talented acts out there doing their own thing: Benevento-Russo Duo, Galactic, Particle, Robert Randolph, etc.

I have to say though, I saw the Grateful Dead a handful of times, I saw Phish 25+ times and I&#039;d rather listen to the real deal that a bunch of phony imitators any day of the week.

That being said, I&#039;m always out seeing new bands play and looking for the next big thing.  There&#039;s plenty of great stuff out there, but there&#039;s also a trainload of pretenders and wannabes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I think it&#8217;s a bigger problem in the jamband scene that the Dead are still the &#8220;reigning&#8221; kings of the scene, though Phish held the crown for a long time during their run.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious if this is because the Dead (as well as Phish) created/developed a unique backstory and history, whereas other bands fail to do this and are relegated to being derivative?</i></p>
<p>I think you hit the nail on the head with that bit. I LOVE the dead.  Heck, I&#8217;m reviewing the entire Dick&#8217;s Picks series on my blog, but the problem with the scene is that so much of it is derivative garbage.</p>
<p>Sometimes I&#8217;ll hear people go on and on about something and am amazed at how bland it is and how much it pales to the Grateful Dead, Phish, Widespread Panic or whoever some of the giants of the scene are.</p>
<p>Thankfully, there are other extremely talented acts out there doing their own thing: Benevento-Russo Duo, Galactic, Particle, Robert Randolph, etc.</p>
<p>I have to say though, I saw the Grateful Dead a handful of times, I saw Phish 25+ times and I&#8217;d rather listen to the real deal that a bunch of phony imitators any day of the week.</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m always out seeing new bands play and looking for the next big thing.  There&#8217;s plenty of great stuff out there, but there&#8217;s also a trainload of pretenders and wannabes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us. Never...&lt;/em&gt;

Here&#039;s what I&#039;m saying, though...

Don&#039;t confuse &quot;love&quot; and &quot;counter-productivity&quot;.

I think it&#039;s GREAT to still have the love for the Grateful Dead in your heart, but to blindly say that any tribute to one of the greatest bands in all the world is a good tribute and good for the scene is not true, in my opinion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us. Never&#8230;</em></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying, though&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t confuse &#8220;love&#8221; and &#8220;counter-productivity&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s GREAT to still have the love for the Grateful Dead in your heart, but to blindly say that any tribute to one of the greatest bands in all the world is a good tribute and good for the scene is not true, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-23877</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-23877</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us. Never...&lt;/em&gt;

Here&#039;s what I&#039;m saying, though...

Don&#039;t confuse &quot;love&quot; and &quot;counter-productivity&quot;.

I think it&#039;s GREAT to still have the love for the Grateful Dead in your heart, but to blindly say that any tribute to one of the greatest bands in all the world is a good tribute and good for the scene is not true, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us. Never&#8230;</em></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying, though&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t confuse &#8220;love&#8221; and &#8220;counter-productivity&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s GREAT to still have the love for the Grateful Dead in your heart, but to blindly say that any tribute to one of the greatest bands in all the world is a good tribute and good for the scene is not true, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>First, kiley, how can Ratdog be a Dead cover band when one of the founders of the Dead plays in the band - does he not have a right to play the songs he&#039;s written and sang for almost 40 years?

Second, jason, I can see how if you&#039;re not a head from back in the day all this revisting can be annoying.

But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us.  Never...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, kiley, how can Ratdog be a Dead cover band when one of the founders of the Dead plays in the band &#8211; does he not have a right to play the songs he&#8217;s written and sang for almost 40 years?</p>
<p>Second, jason, I can see how if you&#8217;re not a head from back in the day all this revisting can be annoying.</p>
<p>But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us.  Never&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-23876</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-23876</guid>
		<description>First, kiley, how can Ratdog be a Dead cover band when one of the founders of the Dead plays in the band - does he not have a right to play the songs he&#039;s written and sang for almost 40 years?

Second, jason, I can see how if you&#039;re not a head from back in the day all this revisting can be annoying.

But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us.  Never...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, kiley, how can Ratdog be a Dead cover band when one of the founders of the Dead plays in the band &#8211; does he not have a right to play the songs he&#8217;s written and sang for almost 40 years?</p>
<p>Second, jason, I can see how if you&#8217;re not a head from back in the day all this revisting can be annoying.</p>
<p>But for those of us who still carry the love, there will never be enough tributes toi honor the memory of the Grateful Dead and all they meant to us.  Never&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>Chilly:  I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one, and that&#039;s not to say that other scenes or other bands aren&#039;t eligible for some of my future rants...

The Dead is an easy target...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chilly:  I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one, and that&#8217;s not to say that other scenes or other bands aren&#8217;t eligible for some of my future rants&#8230;</p>
<p>The Dead is an easy target&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-23875</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livemusicblog.com/2006/02/09/my-grateful-dead-rant/#comment-23875</guid>
		<description>Chilly:  I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one, and that&#039;s not to say that other scenes or other bands aren&#039;t eligible for some of my future rants...

The Dead is an easy target...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chilly:  I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one, and that&#8217;s not to say that other scenes or other bands aren&#8217;t eligible for some of my future rants&#8230;</p>
<p>The Dead is an easy target&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

